Two out of every three Americans play video games through various platforms (ESA, 2022), and gaming is third only to TV and social media in terms of where audiences spend their time–yet gaming captures less than 5% of advertiser budgets.
A new IAB study of over forty brands, agencies, ad tech companies, game developers, and publishers conducted in partnership with MediaScience revealed that investments in gaming are not nearly at the levels they should be due to five lingering misperceptions. The reality is that the industry has built an ecosystem that makes it easier to buy at scale and measure than ever before. The study is being released at the IAB PlayFronts today, March 8th.
“The success stories we heard from buyers about gaming were striking — and all the more so because they don’t align at all with the misperceptions of the industry at large,” said Zoe Soon, Vice President, Experience Center, IAB. “Advertisers are missing a prime opportunity to reach and persuade consumers in these dynamic environments.”
Also Read: Mediavine Becomes First and Only Publisher to End Muted In-Stream Ad Units
Misperception 1: It’s too expensive for brands to get started.
When advertisers think of gaming, they tend to think of high-end, one-off custom integrations. Yet there are many more affordable and undervalued opportunities. While the first generation of in-game advertising media was fragmented and hard to buy, today’s programmatic channels make it easy to buy, are comparable in cost to other digital media, enable marketers to test and learn, and are cost-effective, efficient, and scalable.
Misperception 2: In-game advertising is too hard to activate with quality inventory.
Some advertisers feel that ease of activation and quality is only possible in well-known, premium game titles. “Quality inventory and serious reach are possible,” Soon continued. “With new ad networks and technology, it’s easy for advertisers to get both the scale and brand-safe reach they need.”
Misperception 3: Gaming cannot deliver on key objectives throughout the funnel.
“Buyers want to make good quality buys that align with their brands and drive all the way through to purchase,” said Jack Koch, SVP, Research & Insights, IAB. “And while that is absolutely possible in gaming today, perception lags reality.”
While in-game advertising often mimics real-world awareness media — for example, billboards in a driving game or stadium signage in a sports game — gaming offers much more. You can drive mid-funnel objectives by letting gamers feel and interact with your product. Gamers can drive a branded vehicle in a war game, or get a “power-up” from a healthy drink in a running game and become associated with energy. There’s also ample inventory that is lower funnel and clickable, so advertisers can track through to conversions.
Misperception 4: In-game advertising is too difficult to measure.
AdTech and publishers have brought measurement standards and capabilities up to a level that will meet the needs of most advertisers. However, there is still progress that needs to be made. In some cases, the data is not fully consistent and comparable to other media, and in-game advertising doesn’t yet offer the same level of granularity buyers expect in digital marketing. In a joint collaboration between IAB, IAB Tech Lab, and the Media Rating Council (MRC), in July 2022, IAB released its Intrinsic In-Game (IIG) Measurement Guidelines to establish updated measurement guidelines for ads that appear within gameplay.
Misperception 5: In-game advertising is not brand safe and not welcomed by players.
There’s still a lingering misperception that buyers can’t get brand-safe reach at scale and that in-game advertising is unwelcome.
In reality, with proper planning and through third-party monitoring services and/or AI-based keyword blocking, brand safety issues can be easily mitigated. Programmatic makes it possible to reach brand-safe audiences at scale.
SOURCE: PR Newswire